No increase in air turbulence accidents in 30 years, climate haters shamelessly exploit the Singapore Airlines case

The climate warnings came in the wake of severe clear air turbulence on a recent Singapore Airlines Boeing 777, which resulted in a fatal heart attack. The Guardian asked whether the "climate crisis" was exacerbating the turbulence, and both the newspaper and the BBC referred to one model-based report that said it was. Needless to say, the actual data was ignored in the rush to feed a politicised climate emergency, Net Zero inspired narrative. Figures published by two safety bodies show that there has been no increase in turbulence accidents or injuries per passenger mile over the last 30 years. This is because global air passengers are at least quadrupled in the same period.

The above figures from the International Civil Aviation Organization confirm that the number of turbulence incidents remains low in the United States, which has the largest air traffic in the world. No statistically significant increase has not happened since 1989.

The second chart above was produced by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in its 2021 report. It no showed an increase in passenger and air accidents, allowing for a huge increase in traffic over these decades. The NTSB concluded, "There was no clear trend in turbulence-related accidents during this period."

What the real data shows is that you can't beat a good climate prediction model when the mainstream media has to do Green Blob-inspired work. Both the BBC and Guardian cited the work of Professor Paul Williams of the University of Reading. He suggested that atmospheric dynamics have changed significantly since scientists first observed them using satellite data in the late 1970s. Using climate models and the RCP8.5 scenario, he predicted a clear without a huge increase in turbulence.

Of course, he uses the RCP8.5 route, which assumes a temperature rise of up to 4°C in less than 80 years. This pathway is little more than a climate model game, and more and more scientists believe it is not remotely plausible. Even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says it is a "low probability". Despite this, the click-feed dependence on this scenario remains high, and an estimated 40% of the IPCC's climate impact statements are still based on its for use in modelling . In addition, the trail is said to be backed by an astonishing 50 % of impact observations produced in the wider scientific community, and they provide a handy "scientists say" tag for the latest climate for scaremongering . Science writer Roger Pielke Jnr. notes that the world imagined in RCP8.5 is one that "is changing. increasingly unlikely year after year".

Investigative climate journalist Paul Homewood has been publishing climate and weather stories for many years. He inhosi The BBC's latest attempt. Can the wretched BBC sink any lower, he asked, adding: "You are utter rubbish, BBC - how can any organisation try to play politics with a tragic death like this?"

Homewood's bitter comments are understandable, as the BBC and most of the legacy media tend to destroy almost all bad events and human tragedies that can be linked to the weather. This is despite the fact that many authorities claim that most extreme weather events have not increased in the last 100 years during , man-made or otherwise. In this latest case of atmospheric turbulence, it is surely extremely irresponsible to scare people, young and old, away from air travel by using the unverified findings of computer models with highly controversial data. Unless, of course, the mostly unreported aim is to stop people flying altogether. As regular readers know, many journalists attend courses where they learn to insert climate fears into almost any story. They also subscribe to ready-made reproductions , all funded by green billionaires who seek to radically reorganise the social and economic life of the world's population.

Currently BBC Verifyn climate "disinformation" expert Marco Silva is reaching the end of his six-month sabbatical from the Oxford Climate Journalism Network (OCJN), an operation run out of the Reuters Institute that has previously received funding from several green foundations, including the European Climate Foundation, an operation strongly supported by Extinction Rebellion contributor Sir Christopher Hohn. More than 400 journalists from around the world are retrained at the OCJN , which aims to move climate experts "beyond their closed past" to a strategic role in newsrooms "by combining expertise and collaboration".

Take a mango or any fruit and write about how it is less tasty than it used to be because of climate change, is one suggestion for MEPs. Former speaker and BBC resident Dr Friederike Otto uses climate models to link individual weather events to long-term climate change through the billionaire-funded World Weather Attribution. After her OCJN presentation, participants were reported to have shown a "massive surge of confidence" in attributing a single weather event to climate change. The more curious may wonder how this can be so, since computer-modelled pseudo-scientific claims are, in a word, unfalsifiable and unverifiable.

No Increase in Air Turbulence Accidents for 30 Years as Climate Zealots Shamelessly Exploit Singapore Airlines Incident - The Daily Sceptic

There's been no increase in air turbulence accidents for 30 years, according to official figures. But that didn't stop the Guardian and BBC claiming otherwise in their reporting on the Singapore Airlines incident.